Law Offices of Lawrence H. Jacobson - A Professional Corporation
Practicing Attorney 40 Years - Effective Expert Witness
Attorney Lawrence H. Jacobson
Home
Overview
Areas of Expertise
Legal Practice - Real Estate, Corporate
Range of Testimony
Expert Witness - Real Estate, Mortgage Banking
Expert Witness - Attorney Malpractice
Expert Witness - Transactional Custom & Usage
Profile
Curriculum Vitae
Testimonials
News Releases
News Releases
Resource Links
Findlaw News
Contact Us


Law Offices of Lawrence H. Jacobson
A Professional Corporation

9401 Wilshire Blvd.
Suite 1250
Beverly Hills, CA 90212
310-271-0747
310-271-0757 fax
Email us





FindLaw News

News

Business

[08/13] Ohio man buys new truck with thousands of coins
[08/01] Clothing store opens bar in middle of sales floor
[08/19] Dividend checks to be distributed early in Alaska

More...

Real Estate

[08/15] General Shopping Brasil Posts 74.3% Increase in Gross Revenue in 2Q08 and 67.6% in 1H08. Adjusted EBITDA Rises 96.0% in 2Q08
[08/15] Cyrela Announces 56% of the Sales Speed of 2Q08 Launches and 60% Growth in 1H08 EBITDA
[08/15] Trump to buy McMahon's home, let him live there

More...

Case Summaries

Commercial Law

[08/19] DSW, Inc. v. Shoe Pavilion, Inc.
In a suit alleging infringement of two patents for storing and displaying footwear for customer self-service, summary judgment of non-infringement of one patent and no liability for damages for past infringement of both patents is vacated and remanded where: 1) the finding of non-infringement was based on incorrect construction of claims; and 2) patent infringement is a strict liability offense, and an infringer's reasonable steps and good faith efforts to cease infringing activity are insufficient to avoid damages.

[08/18] Golden W. Refining Co. v. SunTrust Bank
In an action brought by plaintiff to draw on a letter of credit issued to it by defendant-bank's predecessor, judgment for plaintiff is affirmed over claims that the district court erred by: 1) holding that the letter of credit was not "perpetual" under Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) section 5-106(d) and thereby had not automatically expired before plaintiff made a draw against it; 2) by rejecting defendant's waiver argument; and 3) by concluding that plaintiff's specific performance and breach of contract claims were not precluded by the exclusive remedies available under Article 5 of the UCC.

[08/18] Am. Needle, Inc. v. Nat'l Football League
In an antitrust case alleging that the NFL's exclusive headwear licensing agreement with Reebok International violated sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed where: 1) a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(f) to allow additional discovery was properly denied where plaintiff did not identify the evidence it sought to discover; 2) NFL teams are a "single entity" for purposes of licensing their intellectual property; and 3) as a single entity, the teams were free to license their intellectual property on an exclusive basis.

More...

Associated Press text, photo, graphic, audio and/or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. Neither these AP materials nor any portion thereof may be stored in a computer except for personal and non-commercial use. Users may not download or reproduce a substantial portion of the AP material found on this web site. AP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions therefrom or in the transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages arising from any of the foregoing.


© 2008 Law Offices of
Lawrence H. Jacobson
A Professional Corporation
All rights reserved. Disclaimer